Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Tara Moore


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 55240
Date:
Tara Moore


The Daily Telegraph is reporting that the delay was due to Tara's team requesting extra time

"a lengthy delay ensued between Moores provisional suspension, which began on May 27, 2022, and the tribunal on 14-15 December, 2023. Much of this, it is understood, was at the request of the defendants, who asked for extra time to prepare their defences."

www.telegraph.co.uk/tennis/2023/12/23/tara-moore-tennis-player-cleared-doping-contaminated-meat/~:text=A%20lengthy%20delay%20ensued%20between,time%20to%20prepare%20their%20defences.

__________________


Top national player

Status: Offline
Posts: 3373
Date:

I'm not going to lie, I thought she was pretty stupid to eat meat in S America and I don't see why the LTA would fund her defence. That would be a terrible look. I'm sure they will find some way of helping her now she's been cleared.


__________________


All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 6799
Date:

Havng read her Twitter (or X) - doesn't seem to be a happy bunny.

Whatever, like Sam, she will shoot up the rankings, - will be interesting (even more) for next years GBR doubles smile



__________________


Intermediate Club Player

Status: Offline
Posts: 382
Date:

The LTA and AELTC should just throw every possible wildcard at her that they can. She was British No.1 doubles player before this debacle had just reached her first WTA final. She was on the up. She has been totally exonerated not like when Hingis and Sharapova were banned, they simply sat out their bans.

__________________


Satellite level

Status: Offline
Posts: 1223
Date:

The ITIA have challenged the independent tribunal decision on Tara Moore: www.bbc.com/sport/tennis/68141134

__________________


Club Coach

Status: Offline
Posts: 684
Date:

9vicman wrote:

The ITIA have challenged the independent tribunal decision on Tara Moore: www.bbc.com/sport/tennis/68141134


 Interesting - does this happen often? Also how awful for Tara.



__________________

She/her



Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 55240
Date:

Yes. Seemingly they haven't challenged the finding for the other player who was done for the same thing

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 41347
Date:

Coup Droit wrote:

Yes. Seemingly they haven't challenged the finding for the other player who was done for the same thing


 Thats interesting. how different were the cases? 



__________________


Challenger level

Status: Online
Posts: 2625
Date:

Coup Droit wrote:

Yes. Seemingly they haven't challenged the finding for the other player who was done for the same thing




Tara was charged with having Boldenone and nandrolone in her sample, Gatica was only charged with having Boldenone in her sample. As I read the report only the nandrolone ruling is being appealed which Gatica didn't get charged with.

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 55240
Date:

Lambda wrote:
Coup Droit wrote:

Yes. Seemingly they haven't challenged the finding for the other player who was done for the same thing



 


Tara was charged with having Boldenone and nandrolone in her sample, Gatica was only charged with having Boldenone in her sample. As I read the report only the nandrolone ruling is being appealed which Gatica didn't get charged with.


 Tx, Lambda



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 41347
Date:

Lambda wrote:
Coup Droit wrote:

Yes. Seemingly they haven't challenged the finding for the other player who was done for the same thing



 


Tara was charged with having Boldenone and nandrolone in her sample, Gatica was only charged with having Boldenone in her sample. As I read the report only the nandrolone ruling is being appealed which Gatica didn't get charged with.


Interesting - I wonder what their argument is?  



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 41347
Date:

JonH comes home wrote:
Lambda wrote:
Coup Droit wrote:

Yes. Seemingly they haven't challenged the finding for the other player who was done for the same thing



 


Tara was charged with having Boldenone and nandrolone in her sample, Gatica was only charged with having Boldenone in her sample. As I read the report only the nandrolone ruling is being appealed which Gatica didn't get charged with.


Interesting - I wonder what their argument is?  


 To appeal do they not need new or additional evidence to have a case? 



-- Edited by JonH comes home on Tuesday 30th of January 2024 09:17:58 PM

__________________


Futures qualifying

Status: Offline
Posts: 1502
Date:

9vicman wrote:

The ITIA have challenged the independent tribunal decision on Tara Moore: www.bbc.com/sport/tennis/68141134


 A disgrace. Can she still play again or have to wait until the appeal verdict?



__________________


Top national player

Status: Offline
Posts: 3373
Date:

dodrade wrote:
9vicman wrote:

The ITIA have challenged the independent tribunal decision on Tara Moore: www.bbc.com/sport/tennis/68141134


 A disgrace. Can she still play again or have to wait until the appeal verdict?


 Why is it a disgrace, because she is British?  Granted, it's dragged on too long but other than that Tara failed a drug test regardless of what she claims are the circumstances.  Clearly the ITIA feel that she still has a case to answer because of the nature of the drugs in her system.

Quite frankly, I think you have to be incredibly stupid to eat meat in S. America if you're a competing sports person. It's hardly an unknown problem and too many are using it as a get out.



__________________


Futures qualifying

Status: Offline
Posts: 1502
Date:

emmsie69 wrote:
dodrade wrote:
9vicman wrote:

The ITIA have challenged the independent tribunal decision on Tara Moore: www.bbc.com/sport/tennis/68141134


 A disgrace. Can she still play again or have to wait until the appeal verdict?


 Why is it a disgrace, because she is British?  Granted, it's dragged on too long but other than that Tara failed a drug test regardless of what she claims are the circumstances.  Clearly the ITIA feel that she still has a case to answer because of the nature of the drugs in her system.

Quite frankly, I think you have to be incredibly stupid to eat meat in S. America if you're a competing sports person. It's hardly an unknown problem and too many are using it as a get out.


 Because she's already proved her innocence and should be allowed to get on with her life instead of being hounded by jobsworths who stole 18 months of her career and can't accept they were wrong.



__________________
«First  <  16 7 8 9 10 11  >  Last»  | Page of 11  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard