I agree with Naomi's take on mental illness, it is discriminatory to limit the PR to physical illness and I can see no downside to making it equitable. Success in tennis is around a broad skill set although menta toughness has to be one of the most important,
I think it can be taught to an extent but a significant component is hard wired at the elite level. That said there are many professions where the day to day pressures far exceed those of a tennis pro. I agree the mental side needs attention it is however one thing that in a win v lose benefit selects out people early.
I can understand her frustration, i am sure there are opportunities for her that if she has the talent and application will allow her to develop as an elite performance coach.
One has to consider that Jose Mourinhio wasn't a great player but having focused all his efforts into making himself a coach is now passable, not such a good choice given his capacity for discriminating against women in sport.
I spoke to Naomi about 30 months ago in Edinburgh she at that time had no inclination to return to the tour as she enjoyed coaching lovely lady good luck for the future.
Absolutely right thing - put that chapter to bed with no regrets and move on. She's lucky she has the insight and decisiveness to make the decision and move on happily.
Best wishes for the future Cav and thanks for the (on tour) memories!
So the LTA's various extremes flummox and annoy Naomi from her very inside and for so long effected position just like so many of us on the outside, though no doubt rather more so.
And she again summarises and writes well, and I'd say sensibly, about it, highlighting some of the absurdities ( my word ), that result from these "utterly ridiculous" ( her words ! ) extremes. Yes, surely there is a fairly happy medium somewhere between different regimes' ridiculous extremes - time "to steady the ship with compromise and teamwork".
-- Edited by indiana on Sunday 25th of October 2015 08:28:36 PM
Another post from Naomi, always approach the links with a slightly conflicted feeling of why should I be reading this, what did she achieve, so always prepared to be disappointed. But then you read it and it's obviously written by a player who loves tennis, is still emersed in it and wants to influence the process for the better, again it's well written, perceptive and relevant. On reflection she never writes about what it takes to win Wimbledon but on topics based on her experience relevant to development, futures, premature wild cards etc.... Loved the piece on Sharm more power to her elbow.